What is adjudication?

Adjudication is a formal dispute resolution process governed by specific provisions of the Body Corporate and Community Management Act 1997 (QLD), in which two or more parties refer their dispute to an independent third person (the adjudicator) for determination.

Adjudication generally offers a more informal, speedy and inexpensive resolution of disputes than arbitration or litigation.

The legislation governing body corporate adjudication includes provisions for the appointment of an Adjudicator, this typically involves the existence of a dispute as defined in the legislation, the agreement of the parties to have the dispute adjudicated and the lodgement of an application for the resolution of the dispute with the Body Corporate Commissioner – the legislation provides that the applicant(s) may request a particular specialist adjudicator.

Some legislation permits the adjudication procedures to be varied to suit the size and complexity of the dispute, provided always that the principles of natural justice are observed. A straightforward dispute might be considered on the basis of documentary submissions alone. A complex dispute may benefit from a conference or hearing with the parties in which the parties might make submissions in support of their propositions and expert evidence might be heard etc.

The result of a body corporate adjudication, known as the Order, is enforceable in the same manner as a Court judgment. While the hearing of an adjudication is private, the legislation permits public access to the Order.

 

 

Arbitrators, Adjudicators, Conciliators, Mediators, Negotiators

Alternative Dispute Resolution Services Pty Ltd

Body Corporate Adjudication

Text Box: Ø	The precedent contribution lot entitlement judgment in Queensland is: 
Fischer & Ors v Body Corporate for Centrepoint Community Title Scheme 7779 [2004] QCA 214

Ø	Adjudicators Orders published by Warren Fischer include: 
Mr Peter Rogers v The Body Corporate for Taree Lodge and Anor  [2003] QBCCMCmr 235
Mr Roy Elliott & Ors v The Body Corporate for Surfers Links & Anor  [2004] QBCCMCmr 120
Ms Deborah Jones & Ors v The Body Corporate for Botanical Park & Ors  [2004] QBCCMCmr 215
Mr Kjell and Mrs Wendy Kristoffersen v The Body Corporate for Lido Deauville Apartments  [2004] QBCCMCmr 337
Mr Graham and Mrs May Anderson & Ors v The Body Corporate for Cooloola Court  [2005] QBCCMCmr 319
Mr David Lockhart & Ors v The Body Corporate for Newport on Main & Ors  [2005] QBCCMCmr 415
Mr James Skenderis v The Body Corporate for Atlantis West  [2006] QBCCMCmr 259
Mr Leon and Mrs Susan Baker v The Body Corporate for Valley Views (No.1)  [2006] QBCCMCmr 302
Mr Audrey Finch v The Body Corporate for River Park  [2007] QBCCMCmr 223 
Mr James and Mrs Mavis Boland & Ors v The Body Corporate for Westwater [2007] QBCCMCmr 529 
Mr John Armstrong & Ors v The Body Corporate for Acapulco & Ors [2007] QBCCMCmr 621 
Mr Wayne Stevens & Ors v The Body Corporate for Atlantis West & Ors [2008] QBCCMCmr 35 

Ø	Other relevant judgments in Queensland are: 
Fischer & Ors v Body Corporate for Centrepoint Community Title Scheme 7779 [2004] QCA 260
Woodrange Pty Ltd v Le Grande Broadwater Body Corporate [2004] QDC 215
Woodley & Anor v The Proprietors of Quay West Community Title Scheme 16610 [2006] QDC 277
Battin & Battin v Body Corporate for Amity Community Titles Scheme 17543 [2006] QDC 278

BCCMA Orders and judgments are available in the public domain.

When should adjudication be considered?

Adjudication should be selected as the preferred process for dispute resolution when parties require the dispute to be decided by a specialist familiar with the professional or technical background of the matters in dispute utilising less formal procedures then those associated with the Courts. Adjudication is an inquisitorial process as opposed to litigation which is an adversarial process, that is, by utilising adjudication an adjudicator can make inquiries and investigate the dispute to determine the resolution of the dispute whereas an adversarial process is centred on the evidence provided by the parties without investigation by the Court, therefore a higher level of understanding is required by parties in an adversarial process.

Text Box:  
As an alternative to providing the services of a Specialist Adjudicator, ADRS are able to assist with or prepare your BCCMA dispute resolution submissions and/or be your advocate.  An example of disputes managed for clients by ADRS are:

Via the Office of the Commissioner for Body Corporate and Community Management:
Macleay Tower & Villas [2006] QBCCMCmr 768 


Via the Commercial and Consumer Tribunal:
Richard and Judy Hartman ats The Body Corporate for Macleay Tower and Villas CTS 24663  [2007]  KL014-07 



We also offer advice and/or services in:
	ARBITRATION	CONCILIATION	NEGOTIATION
	MEDIATION	Contract Drafting	Contract Administration
	Superintendent Duties	Claim Analysis	Training / Workshops
	Claim Drafting	Procurement Strategies	Contract Interpretation	
Text Box: Ø	adjustment of a lot entitlement schedule;
Ø	review of service contractor remuneration;
Ø	review of an exclusive use by-law;
Ø	contractual dispute about the engagement of a person as a body corporate manager;
Ø	contractual dispute about the engagement of a person as a caretaking service contractor; or
Ø	contractual dispute about the authorisation of a person as a letting agent.

Section 265 of the Body Corporate and Community Management Act 1997 (BCCMA) provides that the adjudication of a dispute of the following class must be a specialist adjudication: